In Walking Up and Down in China, Henry Miller
Speaks of two separate lives—a life in America and a life in Paris. With his
surrealist literary style, some might read him as extremely negative and
hateful towards his own country, America. The way I look at it, Miller seems
discouraged by his country, feeling like an outsider. He states, “I could not
believe, being a man of the American continent, that there was a place on earth
where a man could be himself. By force of circumstances I became a Chinaman—a Chinaman
in my own country” (387). By the term “Chinaman” I see this as him calling
himself an outsider. He speaks of the “hideousness of a life in which I had no
part”—I interpret his hate towards this life as not about life in general, but
more of a lifestyle. I think that things have happened to him in his past that
have made him pessimistic towards so.
Within this
reading, I see hostility towards the aesthetic of “perfection”. The way the
avenues and streets are spoken of, I believe Miller is at one point describing
New York City. The “smiles” of the population surrounding him are what piss him
off the most. He states, “The living walked right over the dead, smiling all
the while to advertise their beautiful white teeth. Its this cruel white smile
that sticks in my memory. I see it in my sleep when I put out my hand to
beg—the George C. Tilyou smile that floats above the spangled bandanas at
Steeplechase. America smiling at poverty. It costs so little to smile—why not
smile as you ride along in an open barouche? Smile, smile. Smile and the world
is yours. Smile through the death rattle—it makes it easier for those you leave
behind. Smile, damn you! The smile that never comes off!” (389). There is a
sense of fakeness within America that Miller seems to be longing to separate
himself from. The act of performing as if everything is fine and dandy, when in
all reality there are troubles surrounding you.
Contrasting to his
perception of Americans, Miller speaks of the faces he witnesses in France and
appreciates and is impressed by the blemishes within because he believes that
there is truth being shed. There is no sense of fraud attempting to be
exhibited, just reality. This theme of
reality is constant throughout this piece. There is a question of what is real?
Is it reality or is it all psychological interpretation? This is where I can
see eye to eye with Miller. Dealing with reality can be so difficult at times
that it is necessary to create our own realities whether it is actually real or
not. I feel like with Miller, it is hard
to tell what is real at times because he is not sure himself what he is
experiencing is real or not.