I believe that it could be argued
that the writing styles of Hemingway and John Dos Passos are relatable. One can
relate to them by the way they both attempt to depict the world. For me, Hemingway
in particular touches a place where it is simpler to see eye to eye, mostly
because I too, am living in Paris as a wandering artist. However, a theme that
is present within the work of the two authors, to me at least is loss.
In A Moveable Feast, Hemingway is as much
of a wanderer as anyone who has moved to a new place. Visiting places such as
cafes, bookstores and the Seine river, he seems to always find himself having
interaction’s with people who engage in different, but working lifestyles and
some ingest the idea of loss into his mind. However, having such a simplistic,
though ambiguous literary style, this could be hard to tell, or might not be
seen to others in this interpretation at all. In the chapter, People of the Seine, there is a theme of
gambling that is brought up; gambling of books. There is a sense of lost here
such as the woman who is selling him books infers how books in English are
worthless. While Hemingway being a writer himself, it is felt that there might
a loss of hope within him, as he continuously recites throughout the novel how
money for him and his wife is tough, especially while trying to base his career
as a writer. After this interaction, the next scene he decides to place for us
is of him interacting with The Fishermen of the Seine. He states, “Most of the
Fishermen were men who had small pensions, which they did not know then would
become worthless with inflation, or keen fishermen who worked on their days or
half days off from work”. It is questionable why Hemingway decided to include
this part of the chapter. Continuing with the theme of loss, it is interesting
how he decides to socialize with retired people who do not have much left of
their lives. Hemingway then attempts to progress into a happier subject of the
spring but does so in a way that loss is present. He speaks enlightened
thoughts of spring being such a happy time, but sadness overflows it by how
sometimes it is thought spring will never come because of the cold winds. He
states, “This was the only truly sad time in Paris because it was unnatural.
You expected to be sad in the fall. Part of you died each year when the leaves
fell from the trees and their branches were bare against the wind and the cold
wintry light…. When the cold rains kept on and killed the spring, it was as
though a young person had died for no reason”.
Unlike
Hemingway, John Dos Passos records in a way that the reader can see, feel,
smell exactly how he wants it to be. In the excerpt of his novel, Three Soldiers, Passos is documenting
social inequity and hardships of World War I through one of the main
character’s, Andrews. Passos portrays the character of Andrews with emotions
full of loss and anxiety. When I say loss, one-way to look at is could be a
loss of emotional feeling. There is a sense of him wanting a way out, out of the
war, and out of his old life. Passos states, “What a wonderful life that would
be to live up here in a small room that would overlook the great rosy grey
expanse of the city, to have some absurd work like that to live on, and to
spend all your spare time working and going to concerts…A quiet mellow
existence…Think of my life beside it. Slaving in that iron, metallic, brazen
New York to write ineptitudes about music in the Sunday paper. God! And this”.
If erasing the idea of war, Passos uses a realistic literary style to place the
reader in the eyes of the character. “I want to wander about alone, not that I
scorn Berthe’s friends, but I am so greedy for solitude.” Hemingway and Passos
both provide the reader with characters in need of searching, which I interpret
as, are caused from an inner loss. Although they are placed in extremely
opposite situations, both authors are giving us a chance to try and experience
the ride along with them, but in very different ways. Hemingway’s style is more
left for interpretation because it reads so effortless that one might just
breeze right over it while Passos, although every work of art could be left to
interpretation in the end, is more straight-forward in painting the picture of
what he attempts to reveal.